Session length

1 / 20

What did the Court say about minority-owned program preferences under state law in Adarand v. Pena?

They pass rational basis review

They are inherently suspect and must pass strict scrutiny

Racial classifications used by government programs are subject to strict scrutiny. In Adarand v. Pena, the Court held that any preference or advantage given to minority‑owned firms under state law is inherently suspect and must be justified under strict scrutiny. That means such a policy must serve a compelling government interest and be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest, using the least restrictive means available. Rational-basis review is not enough, and these programs are not automatically permissible. The decision extended the strict-scrutiny standard to state actions as well as federal ones, so minority-preference schemes must meet that heightened standard to be constitutional.

They are automatically permissible

They require a constitutional amendment

Next question

Find the option that is right for you!

All options are one-time payments.

$12.50

30 day premium pass

All the basics to get you started

  • Ad-free experience
  • View your previous attempt history
  • Mobile app access
  • In-depth explanations
  • 30 day premium pass access
$30.00 $87.50 usd

6 month DELUXE pass (most popular)

Everything with the 30 day premium pass FOR 6 MONTHS! & the ultimate digital PDF study guide (BONUS)

  • Everything included in the premium pass
  • $87.50 usd value for $30.00! You save $57.50!
  • + Access to the ultimate digital PDF study guide
  • + 6 months of premium pass access
  • + Priority support
$12.50 $18.99

Ultimate digital PDF study guide

For those that prefer a more traditional form of learning

  • Available for instant download
  • Available offline
  • Hundreds of practice multiple choice questions
  • Comprehensive content
  • Detailed explanations
Image Description
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy