AP Gov – Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Cases Practice Test 2026 - Free AP Gov SCOTUS Cases Practice Questions and Study Guide

Session length

1 / 20

Shaw v. Reno addressed racial gerrymandering and held that such schemes can be challenged in court under which principle?

Judicial restraint

Due process only

Racial gerrymandering cannot be challenged

Equal Protection

Racial classifications by state action are governed by the Equal Protection Clause, so Shaw v. Reno rests on strict scrutiny of how districts are drawn. When a redistricting plan uses race as the predominant factor in creating boundaries, it must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. If it isn’t, the plan violates equal protection. That’s why racial gerrymandering is something plaintiffs can challenge in court under the Equal Protection Clause. It isn’t about due process, nor about judicial restraint, and the idea that such schemes cannot be challenged is inconsistent with the decision.

Next Question
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy